Interesting Numerical Findings in the Qur'an (or a hoax?):
A partial examination
 
Dr. Mohammad Omar Farooq
[September 30, 2005]
 
Search for miracles is a perennial quest of the believers. Muslims are not exceptions. Readers might already be familiar with the miracle of 19, as allegedly discovered by late Dr. Rashad Khalifa. He claimed that the pattern of 19, as weaved in the Qur'an, is nothing short of a miracle and it authenticates the divine origin of the Holy Qur'an. There was a hulabaloo about this claim. Ultimately, Dr. Khalifa ended up rejecting the entire hadith literature, since it does not meet such criteria of 19 and thus hadith literature, in his view, must have been interpolated by human beings. This was hardly a new finding, because Muslims accept hadith literature not as of divine origin, similar to the Qur'an, but as a source of Islamic knowledge, subject to scrutiny and verification. Some people claim that Dr. Khalifa also ended up claiming himself as a prophet of God.
 
Muslims, like adherents of most faiths, are quite fond of seeking such miracles. However, it is very important that they should search for miracles in a truth-seeking manner. They should do their due diligence in regard to any such claim of miracle or "interesting findings".
 
Recently, a friend of mine forwarded a copy of another such claim of "interesting numerical findings" in the Qur'an. Even al-Jazeerah picked up this story, already in circulation: "Interesting Numerical Findings From the Holy Qur'an." [August 9, 2004; Note #1] That, of course, gave the story quite broad dissemination. Through various internet forums and private lists, it became widely publicized.
 
 As reported in al-Jazeerah:
"Tariq Al Suwaidan discovered some verses  in the Holy Qur'an that mention one thing is equal to another, i.e. men are  equal to women. Although this makes sense grammatically, the astonishing fact is  that the number of times the word man appears in the Qur'an is 24 and the number  of times the word woman appears is also 24, therefore not only is this phrase correct in the grammatical sense but also true mathematically, i.e. 24 =  24.

Upon further analysis of various verses, he discovered that this is consistent throughout the whole Qur'an, where it says one thing is like another."
Since no Arabic equivalent was given for most of the words used by Dr.TaS, it is difficult to verify his numerical findings. For example, to look for "man", what was the word used? "Rajulun"? Was only the singular form included in the count, or plural as well? Were other variations (inflective forms and derivatives) included? Since no such information is given, nor have I been able to locate or contact Dr.TaS, I haven't been able to subject all the entries in his list of findings to appropriate scrutiny. However, there were two items on his list that I have been able to scrutinize and the result is categorically at variance with his claims.
 
For example, according to him, in the Qur'an, the number of time Salat (prayer) appears is 5. The number 5 is also suggestively presented as significant, because Muslims are required to pray 5 times a day. Readily I knew that there is a problem. Actually, the word "Salat" (not including any variations or derivatives) occur in the Qur'an not 5 times, but 60+ times. Here I am reproducing the entire list:
  1. 002.003
  2. 002.043
  3. 002.045
  4. 002.083
  5. 002.110
  6. 002.153
  7. 002.177
  8. 002.238
  9. 002.277
  10. 004.043
  11. 004.077
  1. 004.101
  2. 004.103
  3. 004.142
  4. 004.162
  5. 005.006
  6. 005.012
  7. 005.055
  8. 005.058
  9. 005.091
  10. 005.106
  11. 006.072
  1. 007.170
  2. 008.003
  3. 009.005
  4. 009.011
  5. 009.018
  6. 009.054
  7. 009.071
  8. 010.087
  9. 011.114
  10. 013.022
  11. 014.031
  1. 014.037
  2. 014.040
  3. 017.078
  4. 019.031
  5. 019.055
  6. 020.014
  7. 020.132
  8. 021.073
  9. 022.035
  10. 022.041
  11. 022.078
  1. 024.037
  2. 024.056
  3. 024.058
  4. 027.003
  5. 029.045
  6. 030.031
  7. 031.004
  8. 031.017
  9. 033.033
  10. 035.018
  11. 035.029
  1. 037.075
  2. 042.038
  3. 058.013
  4. 062.009
  5. 062.010
  6. 070.022
  7. 070.023
  8. 070.034
  9. 073.020
  10. 098.005
  11. 107.005  
What I did is searched for the word "prayer" in MSA-USC Qur'an database [#2]. That database is based on English translation of the Qur'an. Also, the arabic words for prayer are more than one (Salat, dua, etc.). Therefore, after obtaining the search result for "prayer," I looked up each of the entries with Arabic-English Qur'an online [#3] for the exact word "Salat" only. Then, I further confirmed the result in a comprehensive "Arabic concordance of the words of the Qur’an." [#4] It appears that the word Salat occurs almost 66 times, not five times.
 
Dr.TaS also claims that the number of times the word "month" occurs is 12, which also appears as significant, because the number of months is 12. Once again, it is not clear as to what word has been used for that finding. Assuming "shahr or shahrun", it is still not clear whether any variation of the word was used in his finding. However, following the same procedure I used for "Salat," I could not come up with "month" or its variation exactly 12 times. If searched by the exact equivalent of "month", which is "shahr or shahrun", I could come up with only 10 times.
  1. 002.185 (twice)
  2. 002.194 (twice)
  3. 002.217
  4. 005.002
  5. 005.097
  6. 034.012 (twice)
  7. 097.003 

Using "months" and the variations, one finds the additional following:
  1. 002.197(ash-hur)
  2. 002.226 (ash-hur)
  3. 002.234 (ash-hur)
  4. 004.092 (shahrain)
  5. 009.002 (ash-hur)
  6. 009.005 (ash-hur)
  7. 009.036 (2; Shuhur; Ash-har)
  8. 046.015 (shahran)
  9. 058.004 (shahrain)
  10. 065.004 (ash-hur)
In neither case, the number count adds up to 12.
 
Let us now turn to one of the primary "findings" of Dr.TaS. He found equality between man and woman in the Qur'an, because "the number of times the word man appears in the Qur'an is 24 and the number  of times the word woman appears is also 24." Let's see how does this hold up our scrutiny.

As I have mentioned, the specific Arabic word(s) for man and woman used by Dr.TaS is not provided in the essay. Nor is available the complete list of verses, where these 24 and 24 counts of man and woman occurred in the Qur'an. Regardless, this is what the readers can find out for themselves. There are four separate words for man: rajulun, bashar and insan. Rajulun occurs 16 times (variation rajulan 8 times, al-rajulu 16 times, rijalan 9 times). Bashar occurs 16 times (variation basharan 10 times). Insan occurs 66 times. Zakar occurs 12 times. Therefore, none of these words in any of these combination agree with the count 24. What about woman? The singular for woman is imra'atun and it occurs 11 times. If the plural an-Nisa'a is considered, it occurs 39 times. Untha occurs 18 times. Once again, none of these combinations actually agree with the "interesting finding" of 24 count.

Imra'atun
(woman)
Nisa
(women)
Rijal
(man)
Bashar
(man)
Zakar
(man)
Insaan
(man)
 
  1. 003.035
  2. 004.012
  3. 004.128
  4. 012.030
  5. 012.051
  6. 027.023
  7. 028.009
  8. 033.050
  9. 066.010
  10. 066.010
  11. 066.011

 

  1. 002.222
  2. 002.231
  3. 002.232
  4. 002.235
  5. 002.236
  6. 003.014
  7. 003.042
  8. 004.001
  9. 004.003
  10. 004.004
  11. 004.007
  12. 004.011
  13. 004.019
  14. 004.022
  15. 004.024
  16. 004.032
  17. 004.034
  18. 004.043
  19. 004.075
  20. 004.098
  21. 004.127
  22. 004.127
  23. 004.129
  24. 004.176
  25. 005.006
  26. 007.081
  27. 024.031
  28. 024.060
  29. 027.055
  30. 033.030
  31. 033.032
  32. 033.032
  33. 033.052
  34. 033.059
  35. 037.048
  36. 048.025
  37. 049.011
  38. 049.011
  39. 065.001

 

 
  1. 002.282
  2. 004.012
  3. 007.063
  4. 010.002
  5. 011.078
  6. 023.025
  7. 023.038
  8. 028.020
  9. 033.004
  10. 034.007
  11. 034.043
  12. 036.020
  13. 039.029
  14. 040.028
  15. 043.031

 

 
  1. 003.047
  2. 003.079
  3. 005.018
  4. 006.091
  5. 014.034
  6. 014.034
  7. 015.033
  8. 016.103
  9. 018.110
  10. 019.020
  11. 019.026
  12. 021.003
  13. 021.034
  14. 023.024
  15. 023.033
  16. 026.154
  17. 026.186
  18. 030.020
  19. 036.015
  20. 041.006
  21. 042.051
  22. 064.006
  23. 074.025
  24. 074.029
  25. 074.031
  26. 074.036

 

 
  1. 003.036
  2. 003.195
  3. 004.011
  4. 004.124
  5. 004.176
  6. 016.097
  7. 040.040
  8. 049.013
  9. 053.021
  10. 053.045
  11. 075.039
  12. 092.003

 

 
  1. 004.028
  2. 010.012
  3. 011.009
  4. 012.005
  5. 014.034
  6. 015.026
  7. 016.004
  8. 017.011
  9. 017.011 
  10. 017.013
  11. 017.053
  12. 017.067
  13. 017.083
  14. 017.100
  15. 018.054
  16. 019.066
  17. 021.037
  18. 022.066
  19. 023.012
  20. 025.029
  21. 029.008
  22. 031.014
  23. 032.007
  24. 033.072
  25. 036.077
  26. 039.008
  27. 039.049
  28. 041.049
  29. 041.051
  30. 042.048
  31. 043.015
  32. 043.031
  33. 044.014
  34. 046.015
  35. 050.016
  36. 053.024
  37. 053.039
  38. 055.003
  39. 055.014
  40. 059.016
  41. 070.019
  42. 075.003
  43. 075.005
  44. 075.010
  45. 075.013
  46. 075.014
  47. 075.036
  48. 076.001
  49. 076.002
  50. 079.035
  51. 080.017
  52. 080.024
  53. 082.006
  54. 084.006
  55. 086.005
  56. 089.015
  57. 089.023
  58. 090.004
  59. 095.004
  60. 095.004 
  61. 096.002
  62. 096.005
  63. 096.006
  64. 099.003
  65. 100.006
  66. 103.002

I haven't spent additional time to scrutinize other words that show up as findings of Dr.TaS. However, my partial examination demonstrates that the claim does not hold up at least in two cases. Readers are invited to verify my findings on their own. If they are able to confirm any other entries in the list of Dr.TaS, I will be interested to learn further. That al-Jazeerah picked up such a story, especially about the Qur'an, without an iota of scrutiny, does not reflect well on al-Jazeerah.

By the way, that the claim of "interesting findings" does not hold up in light of my partial examination does not have anything to do with the issue of equality between men and women. The Qur'an categorically asserts that they are mutual AWLIYA (guardian, patron, friend, protector) of each other. [9/at-Taubah/71]

 
I personally do not need such numerical findings to be a Muslim. However, believing mind often lend itself to such findings, almost blindly. That does not speak very well of the real foundation of one's faith. When there are so many competing claims of the Truth, one has to be a truth-seeking person to avoid falsehood and hoaxes. That requires an inquiring mind, not merely a believing mind.
 
 
Reference:
  1. Al-Jazeerah. "Interesting Numerical Findings From the Holy Qur'an"  
  2. MSA-USC Qur'an Search Database  
  3. Arabic-English Qur'an Online 
  4. Muhammad F. ‘Abd al-Baqi. Al-Mu'jam al-Mafahras li-Alfaz al-Qur'an al-Karim [Cairo: Dar al-Hadith, 1988]
 
[The author is a faculty of economics and finance at Upper Iowa University. Personal homepage: http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm]

Hit Counter

HOME
Index of my writings
Have you visited my site on Kazi Nazrul Islam?
Genocide 1971 Page?
Hadith Humor Page?

Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Hoax Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Qur'an
Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Hoax Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Qur'an
Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Hoax Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Qur'an
Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Hoax Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Qur'an
Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Hoax Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Qur'an
Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Hoax Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Qur'an
Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Hoax Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Qur'an
Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Hoax Tariq al-Suwaidan Hoax Interesting findings Qur'an